Author Archives: Michael Eisen

WOW! Junk DNA as a metaphor! We have arrived!

In an article in The New Republic about how Republicans are being disingenous by opposing the health care bill on account of its length, Harold Pollack writes: Most of the junk DNA of the Senate bill is the usual block-and-tackle of complicated legislation, and is of no particular ideological or partisan concern. Many of the […]

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

We must act now to stop the 2020 metaphors

As we enter the 2010’s a horrible spectre is before us – the year 2020 and the inevitable sickening overuse of 2020 vision/2020 hindsight in articles about the decade. We are seeing it already. Human nature being what it is, I can’t imagine we’re going to actually be able to convince journalists, bloggers and common […]

Posted in misc stuff | Comments closed

Thoughts on the Berkeley protests

I’ve made no secret of my opposition to this week’s protests at Berkeley and other UC campuses. The tactics were stale, the targets were wrong, and the rhetoric was ineffective. But that doesn’t mean that I don’t think what’s going on at UC doesn’t completely suck. The immediate cause of the protests was the 32% […]

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Why I don’t support the UC faculty walkout

I sent this letter to some colleagues who are supporting the proposed UC faculty walkout on September 24th. I want to thank you and the others who are spending their time and energy trying to figure out how to deal with challenges of the UC budget. I understand the appeal and value of a collective […]

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

DNA testing in baseball – more silly alarmism from reporters and bioethicists

The New York Times is fronting a story that combines two of my favorite subjects – DNA and baseball. Unfortunately, the story is ridiculously alarmist, and either willfully or ignorantly conflates DNA paternity/maternity tests with tests designed to extract other information from a person’s genome. The plug for the piece is that Major League Baseball […]

Posted in baseball, genetics | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Letter to the editor in Science

Science 17 July 2009: Vol. 325. no. 5938, p. 266 DOI: 10.1126/science.325_266c Letters Open Access: The Sooner the Better In the Brevia “Open access and global participation in science” (20 February, p. 1025), J. A. Evans and J. Reimer argue that a research article published online is only modestly (8%) more likely to be cited […]

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

The pleasure and importance of print journals???

Nature ran a weird Correspondence from Swiss organic chemist François Diederich. Sir, I am shocked to read in Nature News online that the American Chemical Society intends to stop all personal subscriptions to its printed journals by 2010, and to start introducing major changes this year (‘Chemistry publisher moving towards online-only journals’ http://tinyurl.com/llae53). The attractive […]

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

Um, Nature – not all flies are Drosophila

Nature Method‘s June 2009 issue focuses on “Tools for Drosophila“, complete with a cute little fly on the cover. Unfortunately, it’s not a Drosophila. Instead, it’s a stock photo of a housefly they got from some online database. You’d figure Nature, of all places, would have some Drosophila images lying around?

Posted in science | Comments closed

2009 Grand Prize Winner for most egregious use of “junk DNA”

Research team finds important role for junk DNA by Kitta MacPherson Scientists have called it “junk DNA.” They have long been perplexed by these extensive strands of genetic material that dominate the genome but seem to lack specific functions. Why would nature force the genome to carry so much excess baggage? […] http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S24/28/32C04/index.xml?section=topstories

Posted in NOT junk | Comments closed

Unfortunate lack of links in the NY Times

I get very frustrated every time I see an article about a PLoS article in the popular press that doesn’t include a link to the article. One of our motivations for starting PLoS was to give the public access to the primary research literature, and readers of popular news accounts of one of our articles […]

Posted in cool science, open access, PLoS | Comments closed